A personal library of AI for teaching, study, and course design.
A curated shelf of videos, tools, guides, and prompt patterns for people working in education. The focus stays practical: classroom workflows, instructional design, AI literacy, and thoughtful implementation.
A small set of prompt structures for feedback, study support, assessment redesign, and policy writing.
Prompt pattern
Feedback Ladder
Use AI as a coach that nudges revision instead of doing the student's work for them.
You are a writing coach for [grade / course]. Read the student's draft and respond in three moves only: (1) name one strength tied to the rubric, (2) ask two questions that would help the student deepen thinking, (3) suggest one revision strategy without writing the revision for them. Keep the student's voice intact and avoid providing ready-to-submit sentences.
Prompt pattern
Source-Grounded Study Guide
Make the model stay close to class materials before it starts explaining.
You are a study partner. Use only the attached lecture notes, slides, and readings. Create a study guide with: key ideas, common confusions, 5 self-test questions, and 3 'check your evidence' prompts that send the learner back to the source. If the answer is not in the materials, say so explicitly.
Prompt pattern
Assessment Redesign Sprint
Redesign assignments so student thinking stays visible in the age of AI.
Act as an assessment designer. Given the learning goal, current assignment, and typical student shortcuts, propose a revised task that makes thinking visible. Include: process evidence, checkpoints, an oral or in-class component, and a rubric criterion that rewards reasoning over polish. Keep the workload realistic for one instructor.
Prompt pattern
Course Policy Starter
Write policy language that is specific enough to teach with and not just paste into a syllabus.
Draft an AI use policy for [course / program]. Include four sections: (1) where AI use is encouraged, (2) where it is limited or prohibited, (3) what counts as acceptable attribution, and (4) how students should show their own reasoning and process. Keep the tone clear, teachable, and student-facing rather than legalistic.